Organon F

Volume 28, May 2021, Issue 2, Pages 420–457

ISSN 2585-7150 (online) ISSN 1335-0668 (print)

Research Article

Conclusions of Practical Argument: A Speech Act Analysis

Marcin Lewiński

https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28207

Abstract

Conclusions of theoretical reasoning are assertions—or at least speech acts belonging to the class of assertives, such as hypotheses, predictions or estimates. What, however, are the conclusions of practical reasoning? Employing the concepts of speech act theory, in this paper I investigate which speech acts we perform when we’re done with an instance of a practical argument and present its result in a linguistic form. To this end, I first offer a detailed scheme of practical argument suitable for an external pragmatic account (rather than an internal cognitive account). Resorting to actual examples, I then identify a class of action-inducing speech acts as characteristic conclusions of practical argument. I argue that these speech acts—promises, orders, pieces of advice, proposals, and others—differ chiefly depending on the agent of the action induced (me, us, you, them) and their illocutionary strength.

Keywords

Illocution; practical argument; practical reasoning; speech acts.

Author(s) and affiliation(s)

Author

Marcin Lewiński 

Affiliation

Nova Institute of Philosophy, Nova University of Lisbon

Address

Campus de Campolide – Colégio Almada Negreiros 1099-032 Lisboa, Portugal.

E-mail

m.lewinski@fcsh.unl.pt 

About this article

Received

19 June 2019

Accepted

21 April 2020

Published online

23 March 2021

Publishers

Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences

Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Cite as

APA

Lewiński, M. (2021). Conclusions of Practical Argument: A Speech Act Analysis. Organon F28(2), 420–457. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28207

Chicago

Lewiński, Marcin. 2021. "Conclusions of Practical Argument: A Speech Act Analysis." Organon F 28 (2): 420–457. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28207

Harvard

Lewiński, M.  (2021). Conclusions of Practical Argument: A Speech Act Analysis. Organon F, 28(2), pp. 420–457. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28207

Copyright information

© Marcin Lewiński

Response page

https://www.sav.sk/?lang=sk&doc=journal-list&part=article_response_page&journal_article_no=25890 

The above URL is linked with the article's response page. The response page is a permanent location that is associated with the article's DOI number.


This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).


Contact

Institute of Philosophy
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Klemensova 19
813 64 Bratislava
Slovak Republic
(+421 2) 5292 1215
FAX (+421 2) 5292 1215

Organon F takes part on the long-term preservation of the digital cultural heritage carried out by the University Library in Bratislava.