OK

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more

Organon F

2020, Pages 1–25

ISSN 2585-7150 (online) ISSN 1335-0668 (print)

Research Article

How Not to Argue about the Compatibility of Predictive Processing and 4E Cognition

Yavuz Recep Başoğlu

DOI: to be assigned

Abstract

In theories of cognition, 4E approaches to cognition are seen to refrain from employing robust representations in contrast to Predictive Process, where such posits are utilized extensively. Despite this notable dissimilarity with regard to pos-its they employ in explaining certain cognitive phenomena, it has been repeatedly argued that they are in fact compatible. As one may expect, these arguments mostly end up contend-ing either that Predictive Process is actually nonrepresentational or that 4E approaches are representational. In this paper, I will argue that such arguments are inadequate for the indicated purpose for several reasons: the variety of representational posits in Predictive Process, the diverse attitudes of practitioners of 4E approaches toward representations and the unconstrained use of the term “representation” in cognitive science. Hence, here I will try to demonstrate that any single argument, if it depends on representational 4E approaches or nonrepresentational Predictive Process, falls short of encompassing this heterogeneity in pertinent debates. Then, I will analyze similar arguments provided by Jacob Hohwy and Michael Kirchhoff to illustrate how destructive this seemingly ordinary criticism is.

Keywords

4E cognition, embodied cognition, free-energy principle, mental representation, predictive processing, representation wars.

Author(s) and affiliation(s)

Author

Yavuz Recep Başoğlu

Affiliation

University of Osnabrück

Address

Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück Wachsbleiche 27 49069, Osnabrück, Germany

E-mail

basogluyavuz@gmail.com

About this article

Received

16 February 2020

Revised

26 May 2020

Accepted

9 June 2020

Published online

19 December 2020

Publishers

Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences

Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Cite as

Başoğlu, Yavuz Recep. "How Not to Argue about the Compatibility of Predictive Processing and 4E Cognition." Organon F 2020, 1–25. https://www.organonf.com/journal/Basoglu/

Copyright information

© Yavuz Recep Başoğlu

Response page

Forthcoming

The above URL is linked with the article's response page. The response page is a permanent location that is associated with the article's DOI number.


This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).


Contact

Institute of Philosophy
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Klemensova 19
813 64 Bratislava
Slovak Republic
(+421 2) 5292 1215
FAX (+421 2) 5292 1215

Organon F takes part on the long-term preservation of the digital cultural heritage carried out by the University Library in Bratislava.